Fix type confusion in Serializer.getSerializerRegistration#2604
Fix type confusion in Serializer.getSerializerRegistration#2604riccardobl merged 4 commits intomasterfrom
Conversation
…line 356 Co-authored-by: riccardobl <4943530+riccardobl@users.noreply.github.com>
|
🖼️ Screenshot tests have failed. The purpose of these tests is to ensure that changes introduced in this PR don't break visual features. They are visual unit tests. 📄 Where to find the report:
✅ If you did mean to change things: ✨ If you are creating entirely new tests: Note; it is very important that the committed reference images are created on the build pipeline, locally created images are not reliable. Similarly tests will fail locally but you can look at the report to check they are "visually similar". See https://github.com/jMonkeyEngine/jmonkeyengine/blob/master/jme3-screenshot-tests/README.md for more information Contact @richardTingle (aka richtea) for guidance if required |
|
@gemini-code-assist review this |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Code Review
This pull request correctly addresses a type confusion bug in Serializer.getSerializerRegistration by replacing the Serializable annotation with the java.io.Serializable interface in a type check. The change is correct. I have added one comment pointing out a similar issue on a nearby line that was likely overlooked and could be addressed as part of this pull request for completeness.
Review of Serializable usage fix
Analysis:
java.io.Serializable.classentry.getKey().isAssignableFrom(Serializable.class)- this may also need reviewOriginal prompt
💡 You can make Copilot smarter by setting up custom instructions, customizing its development environment and configuring Model Context Protocol (MCP) servers. Learn more Copilot coding agent tips in the docs.