Skip to content

RDKCOM-5628: RDKBDEV-3486 RDKBACCL-1962 Fix RDKB Security Vulnerability - #151

Merged
hpatel006c merged 4 commits into
rdkcentral:developfrom
vanemage:RDKB-Security-Vulnerability
Aug 26, 2026
Merged

RDKCOM-5628: RDKBDEV-3486 RDKBACCL-1962 Fix RDKB Security Vulnerability#151
hpatel006c merged 4 commits into
rdkcentral:developfrom
vanemage:RDKB-Security-Vulnerability

Conversation

@vanemage

@vanemage vanemage commented Aug 18, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

RDKBACCL-1962 Fix RDKB Security Vulnerability
Reason for change
To address the security issue.

Test Procedure
Test procedures are attached to the Jira ticket.

Risks
Medium

Priority
P1

Jira
https://jira.rdkcentral.com/jira/browse/RDKBACCL-1962

I have read the CLA Document and I hereby sign the CLA

Copilot AI lite review requested due to automatic review settings August 18, 2026 23:49
@vanemage
vanemage requested review from a team as code owners August 18, 2026 23:49
@github-actions

github-actions Bot commented Aug 18, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown

📋 PR Format Reminder

  • Description missing:
    • Reason for change
    • Test Procedure
    • Risks (Low / Medium / High)
    • Priority (P0 / P1 / P2)

Expected:

TICKET-123 : brief description

Reason for change: why
Test Procedure: how to verify
Risks: Low / Medium / High
Priority: P0 / P1 / P2

Copilot AI left a comment

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Copilot was unable to review this pull request because the user who requested the review has reached their quota limit.

@github-actions

github-actions Bot commented Aug 19, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown


Thank you for your submission, we really appreciate it. Like many open-source projects, we ask that you all sign our Contributor License Agreement before we can accept your contribution. You can sign the CLA by just posting a Pull Request Comment same as the below format.


I have read the CLA Document and I hereby sign the CLA


1 out of 2 committers have signed the CLA.
pavankumar464
sshriv323
You can retrigger this bot by commenting recheck in this Pull Request. Posted by the CLA Assistant Lite bot.

snayak002c
snayak002c previously approved these changes Aug 19, 2026
sshriv323
sshriv323 previously approved these changes Aug 24, 2026
Copilot AI review requested due to automatic review settings August 24, 2026 17:44

Copilot AI left a comment

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Pull request overview

Copilot reviewed 1 out of 1 changed files in this pull request and generated 3 comments.

Co-authored-by: Copilot Autofix powered by AI <175728472+Copilot@users.noreply.github.com>
@pavankumar464
pavankumar464 dismissed stale reviews from snayak002c and sshriv323 via cc70a04 August 24, 2026 18:55
Copilot AI review requested due to automatic review settings August 24, 2026 18:55

Copilot AI left a comment

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Copilot was unable to review this pull request because the user who requested the review has reached their quota limit.

@pradeeptakdas pradeeptakdas changed the title RDKBACCL-1962 Fix RDKB Security Vulnerability RDKCOM-5628: RDKBDEV-3486 RDKBACCL-1962 Fix RDKB Security Vulnerability Aug 26, 2026
@hpatel006c
hpatel006c merged commit 54fef65 into rdkcentral:develop Aug 26, 2026
4 of 7 checks passed
@github-actions github-actions Bot locked and limited conversation to collaborators Aug 26, 2026
@AkhilaReddyK7 AkhilaReddyK7 added the community-contribution Contribution from community label Aug 27, 2026
Sign up for free to subscribe to this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in.

Labels

community-contribution Contribution from community

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

7 participants