Skip to content

[release-4.13] OCPBUGS-86877: Bump google.golang.org/grpc#324

Open
rhdmalone wants to merge 1 commit into
openshift:release-4.13from
rhdmalone:release-4.13
Open

[release-4.13] OCPBUGS-86877: Bump google.golang.org/grpc#324
rhdmalone wants to merge 1 commit into
openshift:release-4.13from
rhdmalone:release-4.13

Conversation

@rhdmalone
Copy link
Copy Markdown

Step 1 — Add the grpc replace directive:

go mod edit -replace google.golang.org/grpc=github.com/openshift-sustaining/grpc-go@v1.64.1-sec.1
Step 2 — Pre-fetch the sustaining fork to populate go.sum:

go mod download github.com/openshift-sustaining/grpc-go@v1.64.1-sec.1
Step 3 — Tidy with error tolerance (OTel module restructuring causes unavoidable warnings):

go mod tidy -e
Step 4 — Manually update go.mod to align OTel exporter versions with the OTel core (v1.24.0):

go.opentelemetry.io/otel/exporters/otlp/otlptrace v1.11.2 → v1.24.0
go.opentelemetry.io/otel/exporters/otlp/otlptrace/otlptracegrpc v1.11.2 → v1.24.0
go.opentelemetry.io/otel/exporters/otlp/otlptrace/otlptracehttp v1.11.2 → v1.24.0
go.opentelemetry.io/otel/sdk v1.22.0 → v1.24.0
Remove go.opentelemetry.io/otel/exporters/otlp/internal/retry v1.11.2 (no longer a separate module at v1.24.0)
Step 5 — Tidy again to update go.sum for the new OTel versions:

go mod tidy -e
Step 6 — Update the vendor directory:

go mod vendor
Step 7 — Update semconv in tracing/tracing.go:

Change semconv "go.opentelemetry.io/otel/semconv/v1.12.0" → semconv "go.opentelemetry.io/otel/semconv/v1.24.0"
Step 8 — Re-vendor to pick up the semconv change:

go mod vendor
Step 9 — Commit:

git add go.mod go.sum vendor/ tracing/tracing.go
git commit -m "CVE-2026-33186: fix grpc authorization bypass on release-4.13

  • Replace google.golang.org/grpc with openshift-sustaining/grpc-go v1.64.1-sec.1
  • Bump go.opentelemetry.io/otel exporters and SDK from v1.11.2/v1.22.0 to v1.24.0
    to resolve module restructuring incompatibility with OTel core v1.24.0
  • Remove deprecated go.opentelemetry.io/otel/exporters/otlp/internal/retry module
  • Update tracing semconv from v1.12.0 to v1.24.0 to avoid schema URL conflicts"

@openshift-ci-robot openshift-ci-robot added jira/severity-important Referenced Jira bug's severity is important for the branch this PR is targeting. jira/valid-reference Indicates that this PR references a valid Jira ticket of any type. jira/invalid-bug Indicates that a referenced Jira bug is invalid for the branch this PR is targeting. labels Jun 3, 2026
@openshift-ci-robot
Copy link
Copy Markdown

@rhdmalone: This pull request references Jira Issue OCPBUGS-86877, which is invalid:

  • release note text must be set and not match the template OR release note type must be set to "Release Note Not Required". For more information you can reference the OpenShift Bug Process.
  • expected Jira Issue OCPBUGS-86877 to depend on a bug targeting a version in 4.14.0, 4.14.z and in one of the following states: VERIFIED, RELEASE PENDING, CLOSED (ERRATA), CLOSED (CURRENT RELEASE), CLOSED (DONE), CLOSED (DONE-ERRATA), but no dependents were found

Comment /jira refresh to re-evaluate validity if changes to the Jira bug are made, or edit the title of this pull request to link to a different bug.

The bug has been updated to refer to the pull request using the external bug tracker.

Details

In response to this:

Step 1 — Add the grpc replace directive:

go mod edit -replace google.golang.org/grpc=github.com/openshift-sustaining/grpc-go@v1.64.1-sec.1
Step 2 — Pre-fetch the sustaining fork to populate go.sum:

go mod download github.com/openshift-sustaining/grpc-go@v1.64.1-sec.1
Step 3 — Tidy with error tolerance (OTel module restructuring causes unavoidable warnings):

go mod tidy -e
Step 4 — Manually update go.mod to align OTel exporter versions with the OTel core (v1.24.0):

go.opentelemetry.io/otel/exporters/otlp/otlptrace v1.11.2 → v1.24.0
go.opentelemetry.io/otel/exporters/otlp/otlptrace/otlptracegrpc v1.11.2 → v1.24.0
go.opentelemetry.io/otel/exporters/otlp/otlptrace/otlptracehttp v1.11.2 → v1.24.0
go.opentelemetry.io/otel/sdk v1.22.0 → v1.24.0
Remove go.opentelemetry.io/otel/exporters/otlp/internal/retry v1.11.2 (no longer a separate module at v1.24.0)
Step 5 — Tidy again to update go.sum for the new OTel versions:

go mod tidy -e
Step 6 — Update the vendor directory:

go mod vendor
Step 7 — Update semconv in tracing/tracing.go:

Change semconv "go.opentelemetry.io/otel/semconv/v1.12.0" → semconv "go.opentelemetry.io/otel/semconv/v1.24.0"
Step 8 — Re-vendor to pick up the semconv change:

go mod vendor
Step 9 — Commit:

git add go.mod go.sum vendor/ tracing/tracing.go
git commit -m "CVE-2026-33186: fix grpc authorization bypass on release-4.13

  • Replace google.golang.org/grpc with openshift-sustaining/grpc-go v1.64.1-sec.1
  • Bump go.opentelemetry.io/otel exporters and SDK from v1.11.2/v1.22.0 to v1.24.0
    to resolve module restructuring incompatibility with OTel core v1.24.0
  • Remove deprecated go.opentelemetry.io/otel/exporters/otlp/internal/retry module
  • Update tracing semconv from v1.12.0 to v1.24.0 to avoid schema URL conflicts"

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the openshift-eng/jira-lifecycle-plugin repository.

@coderabbitai
Copy link
Copy Markdown

coderabbitai Bot commented Jun 3, 2026

Important

Review skipped

Auto reviews are disabled on base/target branches other than the default branch.

Please check the settings in the CodeRabbit UI or the .coderabbit.yaml file in this repository. To trigger a single review, invoke the @coderabbitai review command.

⚙️ Run configuration

Configuration used: Repository: openshift/coderabbit/.coderabbit.yaml

Review profile: CHILL

Plan: Enterprise

Run ID: 841fcaaa-0709-4473-9e0b-963c45948e70

You can disable this status message by setting the reviews.review_status to false in the CodeRabbit configuration file.

Use the checkbox below for a quick retry:

  • 🔍 Trigger review
✨ Finishing Touches
🧪 Generate unit tests (beta)
  • Create PR with unit tests

Thanks for using CodeRabbit! It's free for OSS, and your support helps us grow. If you like it, consider giving us a shout-out.

❤️ Share

Comment @coderabbitai help to get the list of available commands and usage tips.

@openshift-ci openshift-ci Bot requested review from simonpasquier and slashpai June 3, 2026 14:45
@simonpasquier
Copy link
Copy Markdown

/label backport-risk-assessed

@openshift-ci openshift-ci Bot added the backport-risk-assessed Indicates a PR to a release branch has been evaluated and considered safe to accept. label Jun 3, 2026
@simonpasquier
Copy link
Copy Markdown

/approve
/jira refresh

@openshift-ci-robot
Copy link
Copy Markdown

@simonpasquier: This pull request references Jira Issue OCPBUGS-86877, which is invalid:

  • release note text must be set and not match the template OR release note type must be set to "Release Note Not Required". For more information you can reference the OpenShift Bug Process.
  • expected Jira Issue OCPBUGS-86877 to depend on a bug targeting a version in 4.14.0, 4.14.z and in one of the following states: VERIFIED, RELEASE PENDING, CLOSED (ERRATA), CLOSED (CURRENT RELEASE), CLOSED (DONE), CLOSED (DONE-ERRATA), but no dependents were found

Comment /jira refresh to re-evaluate validity if changes to the Jira bug are made, or edit the title of this pull request to link to a different bug.

Details

In response to this:

/approve
/jira refresh

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the openshift-eng/jira-lifecycle-plugin repository.

@openshift-ci openshift-ci Bot added the approved Indicates a PR has been approved by an approver from all required OWNERS files. label Jun 3, 2026
@simonpasquier
Copy link
Copy Markdown

/retest-required
/jira refresh

@openshift-ci-robot
Copy link
Copy Markdown

@simonpasquier: This pull request references Jira Issue OCPBUGS-86877, which is invalid:

  • release note text must be set and not match the template OR release note type must be set to "Release Note Not Required". For more information you can reference the OpenShift Bug Process.
  • expected Jira Issue OCPBUGS-86877 to depend on a bug targeting a version in 4.14.0, 4.14.z and in one of the following states: VERIFIED, RELEASE PENDING, CLOSED (ERRATA), CLOSED (CURRENT RELEASE), CLOSED (DONE), CLOSED (DONE-ERRATA), but no dependents were found

Comment /jira refresh to re-evaluate validity if changes to the Jira bug are made, or edit the title of this pull request to link to a different bug.

Details

In response to this:

/retest-required
/jira refresh

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the openshift-eng/jira-lifecycle-plugin repository.

@simonpasquier
Copy link
Copy Markdown

/jira refresh

@openshift-ci-robot
Copy link
Copy Markdown

@simonpasquier: This pull request references Jira Issue OCPBUGS-86877, which is invalid:

  • expected dependent Jira Issue OCPBUGS-86878 to be in one of the following states: VERIFIED, RELEASE PENDING, CLOSED (ERRATA), CLOSED (CURRENT RELEASE), CLOSED (DONE), CLOSED (DONE-ERRATA), but it is ASSIGNED instead

Comment /jira refresh to re-evaluate validity if changes to the Jira bug are made, or edit the title of this pull request to link to a different bug.

Details

In response to this:

/jira refresh

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the openshift-eng/jira-lifecycle-plugin repository.

@simonpasquier
Copy link
Copy Markdown

/verified by @simonpasquier
/lgtm

@openshift-ci-robot openshift-ci-robot added the verified Signifies that the PR passed pre-merge verification criteria label Jun 4, 2026
@openshift-ci-robot
Copy link
Copy Markdown

@simonpasquier: This PR has been marked as verified by @simonpasquier.

Details

In response to this:

/verified by @simonpasquier
/lgtm

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the openshift-eng/jira-lifecycle-plugin repository.

@openshift-ci openshift-ci Bot added the lgtm Indicates that a PR is ready to be merged. label Jun 4, 2026
@openshift-ci
Copy link
Copy Markdown

openshift-ci Bot commented Jun 4, 2026

[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is APPROVED

This pull-request has been approved by: rhdmalone, simonpasquier

The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here.

The pull request process is described here

Details Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:

Approvers can indicate their approval by writing /approve in a comment
Approvers can cancel approval by writing /approve cancel in a comment

@rhdmalone
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Author

/test e2e-agnostic-cmo

@openshift-ci
Copy link
Copy Markdown

openshift-ci Bot commented Jun 4, 2026

@rhdmalone: all tests passed!

Full PR test history. Your PR dashboard.

Details

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes-sigs/prow repository. I understand the commands that are listed here.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

approved Indicates a PR has been approved by an approver from all required OWNERS files. backport-risk-assessed Indicates a PR to a release branch has been evaluated and considered safe to accept. jira/invalid-bug Indicates that a referenced Jira bug is invalid for the branch this PR is targeting. jira/severity-important Referenced Jira bug's severity is important for the branch this PR is targeting. jira/valid-reference Indicates that this PR references a valid Jira ticket of any type. lgtm Indicates that a PR is ready to be merged. verified Signifies that the PR passed pre-merge verification criteria

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants