Repository navigation
chore: add more OSS adopters - #74
Conversation
|
No actionable comments were generated in the recent review. 🎉 ℹ️ Recent review info⚙️ Run configuration
📒 Files selected for processing (1)
Included review availability: This review used your included allowance. Your plan provides up to 1 included review per hour; 0 remain after this review. WalkthroughThe README revises section descriptions and navigation, adds coding-assistant guidance and local test instructions, and updates the open-source project list. ChangesREADME updates
Priority: ⬇️ Low Estimated code review effort: 2 (Simple) | ~8 minutes Change: Other Suggested reviewers: Merge Risk: ⚪ Minimal · up to The README updates assistant guidance, local test instructions, and project links. The documented test workflow matches CI, and no actionable merge-blocking risk was identified. 🚥 Pre-merge checks | ✅ 5✅ Passed checks (5 passed)
✨ Finishing Touches🧪 Generate unit tests (beta)
Thanks for using CodeRabbit! It's free for OSS, and your support helps us grow. If you like it, consider giving us a shout-out. Comment |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
🟢 Approval recommended
The documentation changes are consistent, and all newly added GitHub targets resolve.
0 open findings
What changed in this PR
Updates the README with more OSS adopters and clearer usage guidance.
Changes:
- Adds five OpenFGA adopter references.
- Clarifies model-source labels and section descriptions.
- Simplifies local sample-store testing instructions.
| File | Description |
|---|---|
| README.md | Expands adopter links and improves documentation structure and wording. |
🧠 Review effort: Balanced
💡 Add a code-review agent skill or configure MCP servers for context-aware, tailored reviews. Learn more in the docs.
Description
What problem is being solved?
How is it being solved?
What changes are made to solve it?
References
Review Checklist
mainSummary by CodeRabbit