Skip to content

add overwrite to repeated capabilities - #2183

Open
elebel-emerson wants to merge 5 commits into
ni:masterfrom
elebel-emerson:updateRepeatedCaps
Open

add overwrite to repeated capabilities#2183
elebel-emerson wants to merge 5 commits into
ni:masterfrom
elebel-emerson:updateRepeatedCaps

Conversation

@elebel-emerson

@elebel-emerson elebel-emerson commented Jul 2, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown

- [ ] I've updated CHANGELOG.md if applicable.

  • I've added tests applicable for this pull request

What does this Pull Request accomplish?

Change generated Repeated Capabilities documentation to support metadata-defined descriptions, examples, and identifier guidance for capability-specific behavior.

What testing has been done?

Manually testing change in config.py propagates to html documentation
Create a unit test

@codecov-commenter

codecov-commenter commented Jul 2, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Codecov Report

✅ All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests.
✅ Project coverage is 89.32%. Comparing base (ab52ec6) to head (a5b270d).
⚠️ Report is 8 commits behind head on master.

Additional details and impacted files

Impacted file tree graph

@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##           master    #2183      +/-   ##
==========================================
- Coverage   89.85%   89.32%   -0.53%     
==========================================
  Files          73       73              
  Lines       19006    19048      +42     
==========================================
- Hits        17077    17015      -62     
- Misses       1929     2033     +104     
Flag Coverage Δ
codegenunittests 84.90% <ø> (ø)
nidcpowersystemtests 94.38% <ø> (-0.23%) ⬇️
nidcpowerunittests 89.53% <ø> (ø)
nidigitalsystemtests 92.02% <ø> (-0.24%) ⬇️
nidigitalunittests 68.44% <ø> (ø)
nidmmsystemtests 92.29% <ø> (-0.44%) ⬇️
nifakeunittests 86.01% <ø> (ø)
nifgensystemtests 94.32% <ø> (-0.30%) ⬇️
nimodinstsystemtests 73.85% <ø> (ø)
nimodinstunittests 94.20% <ø> (ø)
nirfsgsystemtests 81.12% <ø> (ø)
niscopesystemtests 89.96% <ø> (-2.99%) ⬇️
niscopeunittests 43.20% <ø> (ø)
nisesystemtests 91.50% <ø> (ø)
niswitchsystemtests 81.56% <ø> (-0.48%) ⬇️
nitclksystemtests 94.87% <ø> (ø)
nitclkunittests 98.26% <ø> (ø)

Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. Click here to find out more.
see 11 files with indirect coverage changes


Continue to review full report in Codecov by Harness.

Legend - Click here to learn more
Δ = absolute <relative> (impact), ø = not affected, ? = missing data
Powered by Codecov. Last update ab52ec6...a5b270d. Read the comment docs.

🚀 New features to boost your workflow:
  • ❄️ Test Analytics: Detect flaky tests, report on failures, and find test suite problems.

@elebel-emerson
elebel-emerson marked this pull request as ready for review July 2, 2026 19:21
@ni-jfitzger

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Collaborator

Why are you changing the file modes of our metadata files?

@ni-jfitzger

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Collaborator

Note: if you pull the latest changes, the system tests will pass.
Not really a requirement for this change, but the PR Checks would look better.

@elebel-emerson

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Author

Why are you changing the file modes of our metadata files?

I did not explicitly touch those files, doing tox -e codegen touched those files, and I just committed.

Comment thread build/templates/rep_caps.rst.mako Outdated
@elebel-emerson
elebel-emerson marked this pull request as draft July 30, 2026 19:08
@elebel-emerson
elebel-emerson marked this pull request as ready for review July 30, 2026 19:38
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants