Update nuspec to place library under nano TFM

[Copilot]

The nuspec file was placing output files directly under lib\ instead of the nano TFM subfolder, and the dependency was not scoped to the correct target framework.

Changes

• Dependency: Wrapped <dependency> in <group targetFramework=".NETnanoFramework1.0"> to correctly declare the nano TFM dependency group
• Files: Replaced five individual file entries (.dll, .pdb, .pdbx, .pe, .xml) with a single wildcard targeting lib\netnano1.0

<!-- Before -->
<dependencies>
  <dependency id="nanoFramework.CoreLibrary" version="2.0.0-preview.35" />
</dependencies>
<files>
  <file src="System.IO.Hashing\bin\Release\nanoFramework.System.IO.Hashing.dll" target="lib\nanoFramework.System.IO.Hashing.dll" />
  <!-- ...4 more individual entries... -->
</files>

<!-- After -->
<dependencies>
  <group targetFramework=".NETnanoFramework1.0">
    <dependency id="nanoFramework.CoreLibrary" version="2.0.0-preview.35" />
  </group>
</dependencies>
<files>
  <file src="System.IO.Hashing\bin\Release\nanoFramework.System.IO.Hashing.*" target="lib\netnano1.0" />
</files>

Original prompt

---

This section details on the original issue you should resolve

<issue_title>Update nuspec to place library under nano TFM</issue_title>
<issue_description>### Details about task
Most of the nuspec files are not using the correct location to place the files.
Files (DLL, PE, PDBX and XML for IntelliSense) should be placed under "lib\netnano1.0" (currently are being placed under "lib" only.
Also they should declare a dependency group for ".NETnanoFramework1.0" target framework.
At the same time those still naming the various file types should use a wildcard instead (e.g. "...\Release\mscorlib.*).
The correct pattern should be (take this nuspec as sample):
nanoframework/System.Device.Adc@aab7bca

Do not change anything else on the nuspec file.

Description

</issue_description>

Comments on the Issue (you are @copilot in this section)

---

💬 We'd love your input! Share your thoughts on Copilot coding agent in our 2 minute survey.

[sonarqubecloud]

Quality Gate passed

Issues
0 New issues
0 Accepted issues

Measures
0 Security Hotspots
0.0% Coverage on New Code
0.0% Duplication on New Code

See analysis details on SonarQube Cloud