Repository navigation
chore: add pr-monitor skill - #26
Conversation
Codex Review SummaryThis comment shows the latest Codex review activity on this pull request.
ℹ️ About Codex in GitHubYour team has set up Codex to review pull requests in this repo. Reviews are triggered when you
Codex reacts with 👀 while any review is running, comments if it has suggestions, and reacts with 👍 once all reviews finish with no findings. |
![chatgpt-codex-connector[bot]](https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/in/1144995?s=60&v=4){kind=small}
There was a problem hiding this comment.
💡 Codex Review
Here are some automated review suggestions for this pull request.
Reviewed commit: f6694994fe
ℹ️ About Codex in GitHub
Your team has set up Codex to review pull requests in this repo. Reviews are triggered when you
- Open a pull request for review
- Mark a draft as ready
- Comment "@codex review".
If Codex has suggestions, it will comment; otherwise it will react with 👍.
Codex can also answer questions or update the PR. Try commenting "@codex address that feedback".
|
|
||
| - a check failing | ||
| - a merge conflict | ||
| - a new comment (inline thread, review body, conversation comment, or commit comment) |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
When monitoring begins after a reviewer has already left an unresolved thread, step 2 snapshots that thread, but this wake condition only handles comments created afterward and the comment policy is only requested on a comment wakeup. Since the mergeable condition also requires all threads to be resolved, the monitor can wait indefinitely without ever surfacing or addressing the existing blocker. Treat unresolved comments in the initial snapshot as a comment event, and apply the same correction to the Claude and Grok copies.
Useful? React with 👍 / 👎.
1 participant
Summary
Verification