Open
Conversation
Contributor
Rule: New - GuidelinesThese guidelines serve as a reminder set of considerations when proposing a new rule. Documentation and Context
Rule Metadata Checks
New BBR Rules
Testing and Validation
|
|
⛔️ Test failed Results
|
|
⛔️ Test failed Results
|
Contributor
|
Are there any known noisy patterns you could exclude upfront like the Windows rule does? Or have you considered making this a new terms rule like the mac one? Otherwise this one seems like it will be really noisy. Maybe as a BBR rule it can be combined with something else more indicative of threat behavior? |
| rule_id = "8248323e-f888-4134-a26f-37a6362f7231" | ||
| severity = "low" | ||
| tags = [ | ||
| "Domain: Endpoint", |
Contributor
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Suggested change
| "Domain: Endpoint", | |
| "Domain: Endpoint", | |
| "Domain: Network", |
| "*adf.ly", "*rb.gy", "tiny.one", "t.ly", "urlz.fr", "rentry.co", | ||
|
|
||
| /* Regional / large providers */ | ||
| "yandex.ru", "*.yandex.ru" |
Contributor
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Suggested change
| "yandex.ru", "*.yandex.ru" | |
| "yandex.ru", "*.yandex.ru", | |
| /* Crypto mining pools */ | |
| "*.nicehash.com", "stratum*.nicehash.com", | |
| "*.2miners.com", "*.moneroocean.stream", "*.supportxmr.com", | |
| "*.nanopool.org", "*.f2pool.com", "*.poolbinance.com", | |
| "*.antpool.com", "*.viabtc.com", "*.braiins.com", "*.slushpool.com", | |
| /* Decentralized */ | |
| "ipfs.io", "*.ipfs.io", "dweb.link", "*.dweb.link", | |
| "*.ipfs.dweb.link", "*.ipns.dweb.link", | |
| "gateway.pinata.cloud", "*.mypinata.cloud", | |
| "web3.storage", "*.web3.storage", | |
| "nftstorage.link", "*.nftstorage.link", | |
| "arweave.net", "*.arweave.net", | |
| "ar.io", "*.ar.io", | |
| "ic0.app", "*.ic0.app", | |
| "icp0.io", "*.icp0.io", | |
| "*.storjshare.io" |
terrancedejesus
approved these changes
Apr 21, 2026
DefSecSentinel
approved these changes
Apr 21, 2026
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Summary
Adversaries may implement command and control (C2) communications that use common web services to hide their activity. This attack technique is typically targeted at an organization and uses web services common to the victim network, which allows the adversary to blend into legitimate traffic activity. These popular services are typically targeted since they have most likely been used before compromise, which helps malicious traffic blend in.
The domains chosen were based on several endpoint rules, manual testing, and the two currently existing detection rules: