exported url generator#87
Conversation
|
No actionable comments were generated in the recent review. 🎉 ℹ️ Recent review info⚙️ Run configurationConfiguration used: defaults Review profile: CHILL Plan: Pro Run ID: 📒 Files selected for processing (3)
✅ Files skipped from review due to trivial changes (1)
🚧 Files skipped from review as they are similar to previous changes (2)
📝 WalkthroughWalkthroughThis PR exposes a type alias and runtime APIs to register custom URL generators: it exports UrlGeneratorFn, adds RegisterBuiltinUrlGeneratorsOptions to allow reinstalling built-ins, updates registerBuiltinUrlGenerators to accept options, and adds validation/normalization to registerUrlGenerator. ChangesCustom URL Generator Registration
🎯 3 (Moderate) | ⏱️ ~20 minutes
🚥 Pre-merge checks | ✅ 4 | ❌ 1❌ Failed checks (1 inconclusive)
✅ Passed checks (4 passed)
✏️ Tip: You can configure your own custom pre-merge checks in the settings. ✨ Finishing Touches🧪 Generate unit tests (beta)
Thanks for using CodeRabbit! It's free for OSS, and your support helps us grow. If you like it, consider giving us a shout-out. Comment |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 1
🤖 Prompt for all review comments with AI agents
Verify each finding against current code. Fix only still-valid issues, skip the
rest with a brief reason, keep changes minimal, and validate.
Inline comments:
In `@src/server/url-generation.ts`:
- Around line 158-160: Validate inputs in registerUrlGenerator: ensure namespace
is a non-empty string and generator matches UrlGeneratorFn (a function). If
namespace is invalid or empty, throw a TypeError; if generator is not a
function, throw a TypeError describing the expected signature. Use these checks
before calling urlGenerators.set(namespace, generator) so
generateUrlForNamespace won't encounter invalid entries; reference the
registerUrlGenerator function, UrlGeneratorFn type, urlGenerators map, and
generateUrlForNamespace in your changes.
🪄 Autofix (Beta)
Fix all unresolved CodeRabbit comments on this PR:
- Push a commit to this branch (recommended)
- Create a new PR with the fixes
ℹ️ Review info
⚙️ Run configuration
Configuration used: defaults
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro
Run ID: cfbf28d6-5db7-4144-9151-889d08be076d
📒 Files selected for processing (5)
CHANGELOG.mdREADME.mdsrc/server.tssrc/server/url-generation.test.tssrc/server/url-generation.ts
Codecov Report❌ Patch coverage is
Additional details and impacted files@@ Coverage Diff @@
## main #87 +/- ##
=======================================
Coverage ? 75.40%
=======================================
Files ? 33
Lines ? 1175
Branches ? 372
=======================================
Hits ? 886
Misses ? 289
Partials ? 0 ☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry. 🚀 New features to boost your workflow:
|
There was a problem hiding this comment.
🧹 Nitpick comments (1)
src/server/url-generation.ts (1)
31-35: 💤 Low valueConsider simplifying the alias documentation.
The phrase "(issue / API naming:
UrlGeneratorFn)" references the development process but will be unclear to future maintainers. Consider revising to focus on the purpose:/** * Alias for {`@link` UrlGenerator}. * Exported as `UrlGeneratorFn` for consumers who prefer function-style naming. */ export type UrlGeneratorFn = UrlGenerator;🤖 Prompt for AI Agents
Verify each finding against current code. Fix only still-valid issues, skip the rest with a brief reason, keep changes minimal, and validate. In `@src/server/url-generation.ts` around lines 31 - 35, Update the doc comment for the UrlGeneratorFn type to remove the internal "(issue / API naming: `UrlGeneratorFn`)" note and instead describe purpose-only: state that UrlGeneratorFn is an alias for UrlGenerator and is exported for consumers who prefer function-style naming; update the comment immediately above the export type UrlGeneratorFn = UrlGenerator; so it reads like the provided suggested comment referencing UrlGenerator and UrlGeneratorFn.
🤖 Prompt for all review comments with AI agents
Verify each finding against current code. Fix only still-valid issues, skip the
rest with a brief reason, keep changes minimal, and validate.
Nitpick comments:
In `@src/server/url-generation.ts`:
- Around line 31-35: Update the doc comment for the UrlGeneratorFn type to
remove the internal "(issue / API naming: `UrlGeneratorFn`)" note and instead
describe purpose-only: state that UrlGeneratorFn is an alias for UrlGenerator
and is exported for consumers who prefer function-style naming; update the
comment immediately above the export type UrlGeneratorFn = UrlGenerator; so it
reads like the provided suggested comment referencing UrlGenerator and
UrlGeneratorFn.
ℹ️ Review info
⚙️ Run configuration
Configuration used: defaults
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro
Run ID: bf1c8e96-e5d5-4096-9c6c-808666df9e24
📒 Files selected for processing (2)
README.mdsrc/server/url-generation.ts
🚧 Files skipped from review as they are similar to previous changes (1)
- README.md
Pull Request
src/server/url-generation.ts
src/server.ts
src/server/url-generation.test.ts
README.md
CHANGE- LOG.md
Checks:
npm run typecheck, npm run test (74 tests), npm run lint — all pass
Related Issue
close #83
Summary by CodeRabbit
New Features
Documentation
Tests
Chores