⚡️ Speed up function _is_jsx_component_usage by 83% in PR #1561 (add/support_react)#1653
Open
codeflash-ai[bot] wants to merge 1 commit intoadd/support_reactfrom
Open
Conversation
Runtime improved from 874 μs to 478 μs (about 1.83× faster, ~82% relative speedup). The optimized version was accepted for this runtime improvement.
What changed
- Precompiled the render detection regex to a module-level compiled pattern (_RENDER_CALL_RE = re.compile(...)) so we don't recompile the same pattern on every call.
- Added cheap substring checks ("render" not in code or "<" not in code or func_name not in code) to fast-fail obvious negatives before any regex work.
- Kept the existing jsx regex (which must include func_name via re.escape) but now it is only executed when the cheap checks pass.
Why this speeds things up
- Regex compilation and execution are relatively expensive in Python. The original profiler shows two heavy costs: re.search(jsx_pattern, code) consumed ~78% of the time and re.search(r"\brender\s*\(", code) ~20%. Avoiding unnecessary regex calls produces the biggest wins.
- The substring tests are O(n) scans using optimized C code (very cheap) and frequently rule out the need to run the heavier regexes. In negative/common cases (no render, no "<", or func_name absent) we return quickly with only a tiny C-level cost.
- Precompiling the render regex removes repeated compilation overhead and makes the final render check slightly cheaper and more predictable.
Evidence in profiling & tests
- Total runtime halved in the benchmark (874 μs → 478 μs).
- The optimized profiler shows the cheap substring check uses only a small fraction of time while the expensive jsx regex runs less frequently relative to overall runtime.
- Tests that represent large inputs with many JSX-like tags but no render() call (the common pathological case) show the largest wins (e.g., big_no_render went from 226 μs → 9.74 μs). That demonstrates the early-exit check is extremely effective on large inputs.
- Some small, positive cases (where both "<" and "render" are present and the JSX regex matches) saw tiny regressions because the extra substring checks add a marginal constant cost before the successful regex checks. Overall this trade-off is acceptable because it yields large wins on common/expensive negative cases and lowers average runtime.
Behavioral impact and safety
- The function’s semantics are unchanged: it still escapes func_name for the JSX check and still requires a render() call (the same word-boundary render pattern is used, but now via a compiled regex).
- This optimization benefits workloads that call this function many times or process large source strings (hot-paths that analyze files or AST-less heuristic checks). In those scenarios the early-fail and compiled pattern greatly reduce CPU work per call.
- If you expect many repeated calls with the same func_name and always-positive cases, a further micro-optimization could be to cache compiled jsx patterns per func_name — but that wasn't necessary to get the large runtime improvements seen here.
Summary
- Primary benefit: substantial runtime reduction (1.83× faster / ~82% speedup).
- Key techniques: cheap substring fast-fail + module-level compiled regex.
- Trade-offs: negligible extra cost for tiny positive cases, but large wins for common negative and large-input cases. This is a favorable trade-off for runtime-sensitive code paths.
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
⚡️ This pull request contains optimizations for PR #1561
If you approve this dependent PR, these changes will be merged into the original PR branch
add/support_react.📄 83% (0.83x) speedup for
_is_jsx_component_usageincodeflash/languages/javascript/instrument.py⏱️ Runtime :
874 microseconds→478 microseconds(best of250runs)📝 Explanation and details
Runtime improved from 874 μs to 478 μs (about 1.83× faster, ~82% relative speedup). The optimized version was accepted for this runtime improvement.
What changed
Why this speeds things up
Evidence in profiling & tests
Behavioral impact and safety
Summary
✅ Correctness verification report:
🌀 Click to see Generated Regression Tests
To edit these changes
git checkout codeflash/optimize-pr1561-2026-02-24T21.52.21and push.