Fix MRO shadowing of VariantLikeType.add_classes#331
Merged
alexcrichton merged 1 commit intobytecodealliance:mainfrom Apr 3, 2026
Merged
Fix MRO shadowing of VariantLikeType.add_classes#331alexcrichton merged 1 commit intobytecodealliance:mainfrom
alexcrichton merged 1 commit intobytecodealliance:mainfrom
Conversation
Member
|
Thanks! Would it be possible to add a test for this too? |
84bf6ae to
6f5813a
Compare
alexcrichton
approved these changes
Apr 3, 2026
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
VariantLikeType.add_classes is shadowed by ValType.add_classes in the MRO for VariantType, OptionType, and ResultType. ValType defines add_classes as abstract (no-op), and because it comes before VariantLikeType in C3 linearization, the real implementation never runs. This means tagged variants can't be passed as function arguments since add_classes returns an empty set, so the isinstance check in _lower always fails with "value not valid for this variant".
For example, passing a Variant("blah", Record(...)) into an option field always fails because the option's "some" case can't match the value.
The fix makes VariantLikeType inherit from ValType, then drops the now-redundant ValType from classes that get it through VariantLikeType. This puts VariantLikeType.add_classes before ValType.add_classes in the MRO. No other method resolution is affected since convert_to_c and convert_from_c are defined directly on the concrete classes.