Skip to content

Revise rewards.mdx for Movement Network details#1299

Open
cshein45 wants to merge 1 commit intobase:masterfrom
cshein45:patch-1
Open

Revise rewards.mdx for Movement Network details#1299
cshein45 wants to merge 1 commit intobase:masterfrom
cshein45:patch-1

Conversation

@cshein45
Copy link
Copy Markdown

Summary

Updated the rewards documentation to better align with Movement Network architecture and developer ecosystem.


What changed? Why?

  • Improved content structure for clarity and readability
  • Added Movement Network context to Base rewards system
  • Refined HTML/MDX layout for better presentation
  • Organized sections to support developer onboarding

These changes ensure the rewards documentation reflects real use cases within the Movement ecosystem and improves understanding for builders.


Notes to reviewers

  • This is a documentation-only update (no contract or logic changes)
  • Focused on structure, clarity, and ecosystem alignment
  • No breaking changes

How has it been tested?

  • Verified MDX rendering locally / in preview
  • Checked layout consistency and readability
  • Confirmed all sections display correctly

Additional context

This update prepares the rewards documentation for future integration with:

  • DAO incentive systems
  • On-chain identity tracking
  • Builder reward mechanisms

Updated the rewards documentation to include new HTML structure and style elements, enhancing the presentation of the Movement Network information.
@cb-heimdall
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Collaborator

🟡 Heimdall Review Status

Requirement Status More Info
Reviews 🟡 0/1
Denominator calculation
Show calculation
1 if user is bot 0
1 if user is external 0
2 if repo is sensitive 0
From .codeflow.yml 1
Additional review requirements
Show calculation
Max 0
0
From CODEOWNERS 0
Global minimum 0
Max 1
1
1 if commit is unverified 0
Sum 1

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants