GH-50476: [R] empty_named_list() uses deprecated .Names in structure() #50485
Merged
Conversation
|
|
Contributor
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Pull request overview
Updates the R helper empty_named_list() to avoid an R-devel deprecation warning by using the modern names argument in structure(), aligning Arrow’s R utilities with current R semantics and keeping CRAN/R-devel checks clean.
Changes:
- Replace deprecated
.Namesusage withnamesinempty_named_list().
Member
Author
|
@github-actions crossbow submit test-r-fedora-clang |
|
Revision: 8279391 Submitted crossbow builds: ursacomputing/crossbow @ actions-4a464d0e34
|
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Rationale for this change
Update .Names to names as CRAN check fails
What changes are included in this PR?
Update .Names to names as CRAN check fails
Are these changes tested?
CI
Are there any user-facing changes?
No