-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 17.4k
Fix Java SDK RC2 blockers: source packaging, jar LICENSE/NOTICE, BOM gap #69582
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Merged
jason810496
merged 8 commits into
apache:main
from
jason810496:verify/java-sdk-rc3-integration
Jul 8, 2026
Merged
Changes from all commits
Commits
Show all changes
8 commits
Select commit
Hold shift + click to select a range
d41cef4
Exclude the full Gradle wrapper from the Java SDK source release
jason810496 60d459a
Add LICENSE/NOTICE and reproducible archives to Java SDK jars
jason810496 709c50a
Manage airflow-sdk-jpl version in the Java SDK BOM
jason810496 8fb34bf
Manage airflow-sdk-gradle-plugin version in the Java SDK BOM
jason810496 2156774
Use rc<N> placeholder in Java SDK release verification clone example
jason810496 3369c6c
Keep wrapper properties in the archive
uranusjr 08df543
Add verification in BOM to not miss subprojects
uranusjr 96299bf
Touch up on Java SDK verification process
uranusjr File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
There are no files selected for viewing
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Oops, something went wrong.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
verifyBomCoverageruns as a dependency ofcheck, but the Java SDK CI job runs./gradlew test(ci-amd.yml / ci-arm.yml), andtestdoesn't triggercheck.So this guard won't fire on a PR that adds a published module and forgets the BOM ,but CI stays green. It does still catch it on
./gradlew buildlocally and at the release "Build from source" step, so the release itself is protected.If we want the earlier signal, switching the CI job to
./gradlew check(or addingverifyBomCoverageto the test job) would close the gap.There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Sure, but I will do this in follow-up as this is non-blocking and Jarek approve the PR so I think we can start the RC3.