Skip to content

fix: add wp_supports_ai() and related constant + filter#11149

Open
justlevine wants to merge 7 commits intoWordPress:trunkfrom
justlevine:fix/wp_supports_ai
Open

fix: add wp_supports_ai() and related constant + filter#11149
justlevine wants to merge 7 commits intoWordPress:trunkfrom
justlevine:fix/wp_supports_ai

Conversation

@justlevine
Copy link

@justlevine justlevine commented Mar 4, 2026

This PR adds a wp_supports_ai() function, alongside a WP_AI_SUPPORT constant, and wp_supports_ai filter.

When false,

  • _wp_connectors_get_provider_settings() will return an empty array (shortcircuiting the other functionality)
  • WP_AI_Client_Prompt_Builder() will short-circuit the construction with a WP_Error() (wp_ai_client_prompt()` will still return an instance, to allow for fluidity to remain intact.

Priority: WP_AI_SUPPORT > add_filter( 'wp_supports_ai', ...) > (default: true)`

Not Included

Using wp_supports_ai() to gate the loading of wp-ai-client or php-ai-client classes. This is to maintain the current usage for developers, and not require folks to rewrite their compatibility yet again.

Trac ticket: https://core.trac.wordpress.org/ticket/64706

Use of AI Tools

  • GitHub Copilot Autocompletions (GPT-5 mini) via VSCode (primarily for doc blocks)
  • OpenAI Codex + GPT-5.3-codex (medium thinking) for code review.

This Pull Request is for code review only. Please keep all other discussion in the Trac ticket. Do not merge this Pull Request. See GitHub Pull Requests for Code Review in the Core Handbook for more details.

@github-actions
Copy link

github-actions bot commented Mar 4, 2026

The following accounts have interacted with this PR and/or linked issues. I will continue to update these lists as activity occurs. You can also manually ask me to refresh this list by adding the props-bot label.

Core Committers: Use this line as a base for the props when committing in SVN:

Props justlevine, gziolo, westonruter.

To understand the WordPress project's expectations around crediting contributors, please review the Contributor Attribution page in the Core Handbook.

@github-actions
Copy link

github-actions bot commented Mar 4, 2026

Test using WordPress Playground

The changes in this pull request can previewed and tested using a WordPress Playground instance.

WordPress Playground is an experimental project that creates a full WordPress instance entirely within the browser.

Some things to be aware of

  • All changes will be lost when closing a tab with a Playground instance.
  • All changes will be lost when refreshing the page.
  • A fresh instance is created each time the link below is clicked.
  • Every time this pull request is updated, a new ZIP file containing all changes is created. If changes are not reflected in the Playground instance,
    it's possible that the most recent build failed, or has not completed. Check the list of workflow runs to be sure.

For more details about these limitations and more, check out the Limitations page in the WordPress Playground documentation.

Test this pull request with WordPress Playground.

Copy link
Author

@justlevine justlevine left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I'm not seeing a good way to repurpose the wp_ai_client_prevent_prompt since that hook seems to pass an instance of the *_Prompt_Builder which we don't have in all contexts (nor should we). Conceptually, disabling AI functionality entirely is higher up than preventing prompt-level execution, so making the builder instance arg nullable just to reuse the filter seems like a bad idea to me.

Same with implementing the wp_supports_ai() function into the class. We want to set the ::$error as early as possible, and not let wp_ai_client_prevent_prompt override the constant nor even run the filter callback if we already know we don't need to.

cc: @felixarntz in case you have some other ideas.

justlevine and others added 2 commits March 7, 2026 19:05
Co-authored-by: Weston Ruter <westonruter@gmail.com>
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants