Skip to content

[GPCAPIM-289]-[Pass integration tests through APIM proxy (with mock CIS2)]-[RP]#101

Draft
BJSS-russell-pollock wants to merge 1 commit intomainfrom
feature/GPCAPIM-289
Draft

[GPCAPIM-289]-[Pass integration tests through APIM proxy (with mock CIS2)]-[RP]#101
BJSS-russell-pollock wants to merge 1 commit intomainfrom
feature/GPCAPIM-289

Conversation

@BJSS-russell-pollock
Copy link
Contributor

Description

To allow for the CI process to run before the APIM integration has been completed, the tests are currently executed against a container running within the same process, which invokes the lambda in the same way as it would be ran within AWS. This ticket looks to alter the target of the tests to instead point at the deployed APIM proxy for the Pull Request.

Type of changes

  • Refactoring (non-breaking change)
  • New feature (non-breaking change which adds functionality)
  • Breaking change (fix or feature that would change existing functionality)
  • Bug fix (non-breaking change which fixes an issue)

Checklist

  • I have followed the code style of the project
  • I have added tests to cover my changes
  • I have updated the documentation accordingly
  • This PR is a result of pair or mob programming
  • Exceptions/Exclusions to coding standards (e.g. #noqa or #NOSONAR) are included within this Pull Request.

Sensitive Information Declaration

To ensure the utmost confidentiality and protect your and others privacy, we kindly ask you to NOT including PII (Personal Identifiable Information) / PID (Personal Identifiable Data) or any other sensitive data in this PR (Pull Request) and the codebase changes. We will remove any PR that do contain any sensitive information. We really appreciate your cooperation in this matter.

  • I confirm that neither PII/PID nor sensitive data are included in this PR and the codebase changes.

@BJSS-russell-pollock BJSS-russell-pollock self-assigned this Mar 4, 2026
@BJSS-russell-pollock BJSS-russell-pollock force-pushed the feature/GPCAPIM-289 branch 4 times, most recently from df1f8b1 to b2e781a Compare March 5, 2026 09:21
@BJSS-russell-pollock BJSS-russell-pollock deleted the feature/GPCAPIM-289 branch March 5, 2026 09:24
@BJSS-russell-pollock BJSS-russell-pollock restored the feature/GPCAPIM-289 branch March 5, 2026 09:25
@BJSS-russell-pollock BJSS-russell-pollock force-pushed the feature/GPCAPIM-289 branch 2 times, most recently from 5b4e7c0 to 8f35053 Compare March 5, 2026 10:42
@sonarqubecloud
Copy link

sonarqubecloud bot commented Mar 5, 2026

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant