Skip to content

perf(ui): look up cycle/module names via maps on the issue list#371

Open
cavidelizade wants to merge 1 commit into
Devlaner:mainfrom
cavidelizade:perf/issue-list-name-maps
Open

perf(ui): look up cycle/module names via maps on the issue list#371
cavidelizade wants to merge 1 commit into
Devlaner:mainfrom
cavidelizade:perf/issue-list-name-maps

Conversation

@cavidelizade

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Summary

cycleName/moduleName on the work-item list did a linear cycles.find / modules.find for every row, and they're called a few times per row, so a large list was O(rows x cycles) per render.

Linked issues

Refs #345 (a focused slice)

Type of change

  • Performance (perf:)

Surface

  • UI (apps/web/)

What changed

Build id -> name maps once per render and look up in O(1), the same pattern the file already uses for stateById/labelById. Plain const rather than useMemo because this sits after the component's early returns.

Scope note

Issue #345 is broader (memoizing the Row/Card components and lifting drag/resize state out of the row subtree so the whole list doesn't re-render on hover/resize). That's a larger, riskier change I've left for a separate PR; this one is the safe, self-contained slice.

Test plan

  • npm run typecheck + npm run lint pass

AI assistance

  • AI tools were used, tool(s): Claude Code (Opus 4.8), commits carry a Co-Authored-By: trailer

cycleName/moduleName did a linear cycles.find / modules.find for every row, and
they're called a few times per row, so a large list was O(rows x cycles) every
render. Build id -> name maps once per render and look up in O(1).

This is a focused slice of Devlaner#345; the broader row/card memoization it describes
is a larger change left for a follow-up.

Refs Devlaner#345

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.8 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
@cavidelizade
cavidelizade requested a review from a team as a code owner July 16, 2026 21:30
@coderabbitai

coderabbitai Bot commented Jul 16, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Warning

Review limit reached

@cavidelizade, you've reached your PR review limit, so we couldn't start this review.

Next review available in: 31 minutes

Enable usage-based reviews in Billing to review now. Otherwise, wait until the next included review is available.
You're only billed for reviews past your plan's rate limits ($0.25/file).

How can I continue?

After more reviews become available, a review can be triggered using the @coderabbitai review command as a PR comment. Alternatively, push new commits to this PR.

To avoid repeated limits, reduce automatic review volume by pausing incremental auto-reviews earlier, using label-based review opt-in, excluding WIP or generated PR titles, or requesting reviews manually when the PR is ready. If your team needs uninterrupted high-volume reviews, an organization admin can enable usage-based reviews.

How do review limits work?

CodeRabbit enforces per-developer PR review limits for each organization. Most developers receive the normal plan review availability.

For paid Pro and Pro+ PR reviews, CodeRabbit uses adaptive limits for sustained high-volume activity. When a developer's recent PR review activity reaches the 95th percentile or higher among CodeRabbit users, additional reviews become available more gradually as earlier reviews age out of the rolling window.

Please refer docs for additional details.

Review details
⚙️ Run configuration

Configuration used: Organization UI

Review profile: CHILL

Plan: Pro Plus

Run ID: 5bd0de9e-23a6-46f7-9163-f793d25f4c26

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between 61bc903 and a559e6b.

📒 Files selected for processing (1)
  • apps/web/src/pages/IssueListPage.tsx
✨ Finishing Touches
🧪 Generate unit tests (beta)
  • Create PR with unit tests

Thanks for using CodeRabbit! It's free for OSS, and your support helps us grow. If you like it, consider giving us a shout-out.

❤️ Share

Comment @coderabbitai help to get the list of available commands.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant