Is there a limit of 100 open issues?

[danbri]

(Not that any sane project should be trying to print out 175 open issues, oh no... :)

I looked in the code for 100, saw a curl to https://api.github.com/repos/pocketworks/repo/issues?per_page=100 ...

[Arkkimaagi]

Urgh, I have 104 issues 💩

I'd love to have some option to print the remaining 4 issues or to include them somehow.

[Splendorr]

Would also love to print ALL open issues. The whole point of this is to print them out and organize (and hopefully condense/remove a bunch...) my open issues. We make issues for small things. There are 375 open issues in our project right now. I'm having the darnedest time getting a good look at all of them...

[danbri]

Yeah, those of us most in need of this tool will get least value from it. Maybe it's a github API issue?

[stalane]

Bump

[vdauwera]

bump

[danbri]

@jgrau 's fork seems most active lately. @jgrau - any insight on this? Is it a Github API limitation? (i.e. we'd need code that paged through the results in several fetches...)

[jgrau]

Sorry about the late reply - holiday mode here. I haven't had the issue but I just searched the code and the github api documentation and it seems the default page size for an api result is 30. That number can be changed with the per_page parameter and be set to a number up to 100. See https://developer.github.com/v3/#pagination. In the code, per_page is set to 200. I think the correct approach is to change the code to set per_page to 100 and to page through multiple pages if there are more than 100 results.

[danbri]

Trying @RichardWallis's fork from the patch #10 he just mentioned, it works for me:

19:28 $ ./bin/git2pdf gen schemaorg/schemaorg -u danbri
Creating a PDF of GitHub issues for repos: schemaorg/schemaorg
Password:
Loading: 100 200 300 400 457 issues
457 cards output to issues.pdf

Now to remember how to best print them in OSX Preview. Something like "Print > [set to landscape]; then Layout > Pages per Sheet = 9" then "save as PDF" to capture the compressed layout. I'll test it tomorrow. Anyway this looks good, cheers @RichardWallis :)