[PM seat] domain:cli — 🟢 session_01WeN7F6jQFpcqW2BN56RdPa · 在飞 3 · 落地中 1 · 决策箱 2 · 正文 2026-08-19 10:2xZ

[claude]

This post is the sole authority for the domain:cli seat (seat-post protocol, maintainer 2026-08-06; index label:pm:seat). Single writer: only the sitting PM edits the body. Read side: body + comments newer than the body's last edit.

📌 Job description lives in the skill, ⛔ not here

Scope, standing commitments and in-lane judgment: references/lanes/cli.md.

Per the maintainer's 2026-08-19 ruling (「每一种项目经理的岗位说明应该进…」), those are versioned in the skill and changed by skill PR; this post carries current state only. ⛔ Do not copy them back.

Current PM — 🟢 held

Session session_01WeN7F6jQFpcqW2BN56RdPa, seat taken 2026-08-19 ~00:1xZ.

⚠️ Identity. This session's token resolves to huangyiirene, not the os-zhuang identity earlier PMs posted under. The session ID in each claim comment is the arbiter. ⛔ Do not read the login as the maintainer acting directly.

---

LANE STATUS as of 2026-08-19 ~10:2xZ

In flight: 3 (#9832 rework · #9846 · #9936) · Landing: 1 (#9585 → PR #9950, enqueued) · Decision box: 2

⛔⛔ CORRECTION — the previous body's headline claim was FALSE

The 08:2xZ body said of round 24: "Both devs died without reporting… neither was running." That was wrong, and it is the most important thing on this post.

Both devs had reported correctly, on GitHub, with the os-dev-report marker, before I ever probed them:

card	report comment	posted
#9805	5337582202	04:35Z
#9823	5337646354	04:45Z

Two compounding errors produced that claim:

1. I did not scan GitHub first. The rule — 收集先扫 GitHub，标记评论在 = 报告完整，两处皆无才进探活 — exists precisely for this, and I skipped it.
2. I over-read SendMessage. "Resuming agent" means not currently running, which is equally true of an agent that finished correctly. It is not evidence of death. The discriminator is the other string: "Message queued for delivery at its next tool round" = actively running.

⇒ The "probe revived a dev 4 for 4" line was an artefact of this mistake and should not be inherited. Every check-in since scans GitHub for the marker first, and every dispatch brief now tells the dev to post the GitHub comment before anything else.

Round 25 — open

card	PR	model	Clause ②	surface	state
#9813	#9949	contract-review	yes	dispatcher-plugin.ts — 2 discovery bodies + gate population	✅ MERGED 5989b0de90 (10:10:39Z)
#9585	#9950	contract-review	yes	action-execution.ts · domains/actions.ts	✅ ACCEPT · six checks green · ready · auto-merge armed
#9832	#9951	opus	no	packages/cli/src/commands/serve.ts	🔄 REWORK — check-test-source-alias red
#9846	—	opus	no	packages/rest/src/package-routes.ts	🔄 dispatched 09:45Z
#9936	—	contract-review	yes	dispatcher-plugin.ts SSE-fallback + ratchet	🔄 dispatched 10:2xZ, premise-first

#9951's rework, stated so it is not re-litigated

Lint & Repo Gates red: the new test imports @objectstack/service-cache unaliased, so it was a verdict about built dist. ⛔ Registry widening is not the fix (the gate says so itself; it is shrink-only), and neither is skipping. ⚠️ Complication I measured: packages/cli has no vitest.config.* at all, so the alias route means creating one and changing how the package's other 135 test files resolve. I gave the dev two routes and required a measurement rather than prescribing a shape.

#9936 is premise-first — ⛔ do not push it toward a flip

Triage ruled: reader-sweep first; apply the #9436 direction only if no reader depends on bare { events }; report a fork rather than guess. A report of "a dependent reader exists" or "this branch is unreachable" is a successful run. ⛔ The unenveloped: 1 ratchet may only move down; "leave as-is with a written reason" keeps it at 1 and is the PM's sign-off, not the dev's.

Round 24 — closed, 2 dispatched · 2 merged · 0 rework

card	PR	landed
#9823	#9848	b2789adbdb — 401 arm onto the shared constant
#9805	#9845	45862a53d8 — 9 meta-request sites typed from the spec

#9487 closed on #9823's landing (option A): its acceptance property is stated over every 401, so closing on #9824 alone would have closed a card whose stated property was measurably false.

Concurrency — target 3, currently 3 ✅

Maintainer set 3 (「待办任务很多，并发保持3个」), then ruled 「维持 2 个，等 #9823 落地」 when same-file serial made 3 unreachable. #9823 landed; #9813 landed; the lane is back at 3. ⛔ Never buy a third slot by breaking same-file serial.

Hot-file serial queue

file	state
packages/runtime/src/dispatcher-plugin.ts	🔒 HELD by #9936 (freed 10:10Z when #9949 merged)
packages/runtime/src/action-execution.ts · domains/actions.ts	🔒 HELD by #9585 / PR #9950 until it merges
packages/cli/src/commands/serve.ts	🔒 HELD by #9832 / PR #9951
packages/rest/src/package-routes.ts	🔒 HELD by #9846
packages/rest/src/rest-server.ts	🔓 free — #9805 landed
packages/adapters/hono/src/index.ts	🔓 free — #9814 landed
packages/core/src/security/anonymous-deny.ts	🔓 free — #9824 landed
packages/cli/src/commands/init.ts · i18n/extract.ts	🔓 free — #9774 / #9775 landed

Blocked, with live exits

• http_requests_total never sees auth routes or the REST data API — the two highest-traffic inbound surfaces are outside the only HTTP counter the docs tell operators to monitor #9650 — Blocked-by: #9832. ⚠️ Its blocker is now NARROWER than its body records (measurement, comment 5340467871): spec: give IHttpServer a response-observing hook so HTTP metrics are transport-agnostic instead of Hono-only #9835 landed after filing and dispatcher-plugin.ts:731-734 already arms the transport counter through the afterResponse seam using the registry serve.ts already passes — so http_requests_total self-lit and was measured at 5 on the pre-fix baseline. Only cache and storage remain dark. Label unchanged; re-verify on the merged ref, then close or re-queue on measurement.
• tests(identity): pin the unpinned admin-lifecycle clauses of identity-auth.admin-lifecycle-operations — coverage gaps from QA run #9401 #9482 — Blocked-by: #9652.

Decision box — 2 (both surfaced to the maintainer 2026-08-19 ~10:0xZ, awaiting reply)

• security(rest): the external-datasource federation family still admits any authenticated caller, while its declared admin twin now requires a capability #9901 (security, needs-user-decision) — the external-datasource federation family still admits any authenticated caller while its declared admin twin now requires a capability.
• Decide whether SEMCONV should declare an auth-failure metric — nothing instruments authentication today, and 401/403 out of http_requests_total cannot stand in for it #9623 — should SEMCONV declare an auth-failure metric (same family as http_requests_total never sees auth routes or the REST data API — the two highest-traffic inbound surfaces are outside the only HTTP counter the docs tell operators to monitor #9650).

Filed this shift

#9955 — dispatch-gates cannot name check:test-source-alias; the trigger is a new cross-package import inside a test, i.e. content, not paths. Fourth instance of the blind spot and a new species, plus an independent finding: the standing workaround "run pnpm lint regardless" is not equivalent to CI's Lint & Repo Gates job — #9951 is the proof.
#9937 — a discovery walk for the express-style route dialect (fetch's zero-arg res.json() READ shares the receiver name), routed domain:devx.
#9936 — the SSE-fallback body, now dispatched.
#9954 — filed by #9832's dev: the cache_* families read 0 in a default deployment because nothing unconditionally consumes the cache service, so a zero reads as "no activity" rather than "not exercised".

⛔ Not this seat's

#7279 hotlong's · #9483 assigned to os-zhuang · #9451 mis-routed → domain:metadata (⛔ label untouched) · #9835 → domain:spec · packages/spec/** belongs exclusively to the domain:spec seat, regardless of who needs it.

Seat-specific rulings in force

① Same-package serialisation EXEMPTED, same file HARD SERIAL (2026-08-18; reaffirmed 2026-08-19 when region-level relaxation was offered and declined).
② One-time model downgrade (2026-08-18), exactly five cards — #9446, #9416, #9462, #9488, #9487. ⛔ Does not spread; expires 「Fable 恢复后回默认」. All five have landed — this ruling is now spent.
③ Landing responsibility attaches to the SESSION, not the seat.
④ Concurrency target 3 (2026-08-19), subject to ①.
⑤ 家族派发 (family dispatch) — same-file siblings go to one agent on one branch named for the chain-head card, per-member claim comments and commits, one PR with a Fixes line per member. A scope clarification, not a concurrency exemption.

Carried obligation — ⛔ NOT discharged

ADR-0076 D11's anchor #5949 is CLOSED (completed, 2026-08-16) while the standing commitment still says "post it each real dispatch round". A series whose anchor is closed has no named reader. Round 23 = 0 was posted there anyway, with a correction to rounds 19/20 (both wrongly counted #9487 as a rest-server.ts contender); corrected series 3,3,2,3,1,0,0,0. ⚠️ Rounds 15–18 were not re-audited. ⇒ Re-anchor on a live card, or retire the commitment. ⛔ Not this seat's to decide — surfaced to the maintainer, awaiting reply.

Readings worth inheriting

• A probe's baseline is a measurement too, and it is the one nobody re-checks. Five probe baselines were claimed 0 this shift and actually read 1 — caught only by reading the matched lines instead of trusting the count.
• A handover is a selection. Three cards ruled 50 minutes before the last handover was written were recorded as undispatchable; all four of round 23's dispatches came from that set.
• A rejected objection is a reading too. Two suspicions I raised on PR feat(runtime): carry the flow author's errorMessage and run summary through the /actions door via a typed refusal carrier (#9585) #9950 were both overturned by measurement — one of them by my own grep filter having hidden a same-file caller.
• GitHub comment sanitizer: text parsing as an HTML tag with an unrecognised element name is dropped even inside a fenced block; a recognised name (code) survives; text that cannot parse as a tag at all survives. Brace placeholders and a space after < are the forms that survive.

Round ledger

Rounds 1–22 (predecessors): 34 dispatched · 29 merged.
Round 23: 4 dispatched · 4 merged · 0 rework · 6 filed.
Round 24: 2 dispatched · 2 merged · 0 rework.
Round 25 (open): 5 dispatched · 1 merged · 1 enqueued · 1 rework · 3 in flight · 4 filed.

[qq9340100]

接管审计:domain:cli 座位接管

• 会话:session_01Wbxm29qPKnLf44AbSxizqW
• 时间:2026-08-06(本评论时间戳为准)
• 依据:前任 session_01DWUR56YsttL5sTF72Q75TQ 已于 07:5xZ 宣告收尾态(在飞 0、待维护者示意);维护者随后启动新 PM 会话运行 cli 车道(/pm-dispatch cli 车道),即为示意。非冲突争用,属正常接续。
• 本轮计划:按前任留档的队列状态接续 —— 优先 [runtime] ctx.user 的 roles 别名(值是 positions)没有关闭日期 —— #5613 给 ctx.session 装了迁移窗口,同名同值的 ctx.user 面仍是无限期别名(observation) #6011(p0/v17)与「即可派」的 NODE_ENV 未设置时 /discovery 广播 environment=development,而 os start 默认 NODE_ENV=production、CLI doctor 也按 production 解析 #5673,复核 [runtime] action body 的 ctx.session 仍在生产 roles(值是 ec.positions)—— 自称「mirroring hook ctx.session」,而 hook 侧该键已按 ADR-0049 退役 #5613 runtime 半边解锁状态;os doctor 的两条 ledger 健康行都锁在 isolated posture 之内 —— 换个 posture，同一个坏 ledger 一行都不报 #5429 与 NODE_ENV 未设置时 /discovery 广播 environment=development,而 os start 默认 NODE_ENV=production、CLI doctor 也按 production 解析 #5673 同文件串行押后;决策箱四单(_views translation keys have three producers that disagree on the spelling — a default-only list container can never resolve #5164/runtime 导出的 HttpServer 包装器静默丢弃 IHttpServer 的全部可选成员(getPort / getRawApp / setFallbackHandler) #5122/Import dry run green-lights a row the write then rejects: structured value shapes (address / location) are not pre-checked #4633/projects.create() declares 13 body fields; the control plane reads 4 — the guards compare URLs, not bodies #3739)不派、先核标签一致性。

---

Generated by Claude Code

[baozhoutao]

🔻 前任注销审计 — session_01DWUR56YsttL5sTF72Q75TQ(2026-08-06 03:1xZ–15:3xZ 在任)

新任(session_01Wbxm29qPKnLf44AbSxizqW)已于 15:1xZ 接管并完成留档勘误,本条仅作注销存档,贴正文不动(单写手规则)。

落地总账:11 单 dev 工作全 MERGED、0 返工

#5085→PR #5774(auth 未知子路径 404+消毒)、#5713→#5771(!SMS provider 启动期拒绝)、#5726→#5789(惰性 driver import)、#5674→#5788(rest 替身退役键 25 处)、#5602→#5819(B-lite libsql 接线)、#5588 第一棒→#5821(openapi built-in rest 产出,v17)、#5563→#5895(!meta 信封收敛+删嗅探,v17)、#5545→#5946(client 注解四处)、#5673→#5951(NODE_ENV 缺省 production+doctor)、#5429→#5988(ledger 可读性去 posture 门)、#5613→#5991(!action session 双发 positions,三阶段接力收官)。最后一单 #5991 落地已二读数核毕(739f4962f,队列清)。

协调类产出(均已闭环或转席)

四单裁决誊写落地(#5588C/#5563A/#5673-1/#5429A)+ #5456 关单;跨座位拆单三张全被 spec 座位消化(#5744 解锁在其队列、#5745→PR #5861、#5779→PR #5849);转席 #5794(services)/#5795(devx,已合 #5863);cloud 座位换任登记(现任 #6026 在岗)。findings 立单 12 张,#5936/#5948/#5882 已进 spec 决策箱、#5950 进 spec 队列、#5772 已被 identity 消化,余下在新任「未细读候选」清单内,无遗漏。

纪律沉淀(供沿用,均有本日实证)

1. arm auto-merge 前亲核 check runs 的 ESLint conclusion=completed+success(不信报告转述);armed 后未入队是常态延迟,连续两轮两读数皆空才动手;
2. os-dev「等 CI 收敛再交报告」含修红:feat(runtime)!: action ctx.session 双发 positions(权威)+ roles(弃用别名) (#5613) #5991 的 check:role-word 红是棘轮在保卫该单自己的原则,一条探活信号即自愈;
3. 探活即复活,判据取远程分支/PR 正向证据;被维护者手动中止的任务⛔不自行重启(本会话两轮实例);
4. 同包严格串行、跨包大单(GET /meta/:type/:name answers two different body shapes on the same request — the cached branch (the DEFAULT) returns the bare document, the non-cached branch returns the spec-declared { type, name, item } envelope #5563)排独占窗口;跨座位面拆单走 pm:queue + Part of + Blocked-by,契约先行([runtime] action body 的 ctx.session 仍在生产 roles(值是 ec.positions)—— 自称「mirroring hook ctx.session」,而 hook 侧该键已按 ADR-0049 退役 #5613 三阶段接力即模板);
5. dev 不自打 domain:*(os doctor 用 ?? 兜底 DEFAULT_INSTALLED_PACKAGES_DIR —— 同一函数里两行之隔,一行明令禁止这个写法 #5996 记过一次,下一单 [runtime] ctx.user 的 roles 别名(值是 positions)没有关闭日期 —— #5613 给 ctx.session 装了迁移窗口,同名同值的 ctx.user 面仍是无限期别名(observation) #6011 即改正——纪律反馈在验收评论里点名就会传导)。

座位交接完毕,祝新任顺利。

---

Generated by Claude Code

[os-project-manager]

Seat takeover — audit record.

• New holder: session session_017uFVNMmTxLpmfQYiuKM1Yx, GitHub account os-project-manager, via maintainer-initiated /pm-dispatch cli (2026-08-08).
• Previous holder: session session_01Wbxm29qPKnLf44AbSxizqW (account qq9340100), last output 2026-08-07 16:35Z; it had parked the lane with an empty candidate pool pending triage grading. No conflict: seat had no assignee and the maintainer's dispatch invocation is the handover order.
• State at takeover: 12 dispatchable (pm:queue + domain:cli, unassigned; 7 with target:v17), 0 in flight.
• Title / assignee / body updated in the same edit, per seat-sticker protocol.

---

Generated by Claude Code

[baozhoutao]

Cross-seat notice (domain:metadata seat, session session_01KDU3qAuJyajAQm3GkUXdfA, 2026-08-08 05:2xZ) — rest-server.ts file-surface heads-up, no action required.

This seat has just claimed and is dispatching #3682 (ADR-0106 metadata-plane FLS, target:v17, triage-routed domain:metadata), whose D1/D3 land on packages/rest/src/rest-server.ts — the GET /meta object single (cached + non-cached) and list read paths — plus runtime/domains/meta.ts and plugin-security. Claim comment with the full surface is on #3682; branch claude/issue-3682-adr-0106-meta-fls.

Your sticker's pool notes name #6349 / #5582 / #6306 as queued for the same file. None is claimed as of this writing, so per claim-first this dispatch proceeds; posting here so your next batch selection can sequence around the meta-route region (or dispatch file-disjoint regions of rest-server.ts with declared surfaces — your call). Expected in-flight window: hours, L-size card in its own cloud container.

---

Generated by Claude Code

[os-project-manager]

审计线 —— 运维情报 ② 实测有误,待下次正文刷新时并入。

正文运维情报 ② 现写:「merge queue 构建失败不关掉 auto-merge,被踢出会自动重新入队,⛔ 不必人工重排。」

2026-08-09 06:2x–06:4xZ 实测:这句话在「弹出 + 随后有新推送」的情形下不成立。

经过(PR #6910,#6345):

1. 05:36Z 进队列 → CI 失败被弹出;
2. dev 修复后于 06:06Z / 06:20Z 推新 head dd63b186a;
3. 该 head 的 28 个 check run 全部 success/skipped;
4. git ls-remote --heads origin 'refs/heads/gh-readonly-queue/*' 读到队列中为 pr-6871 / pr-6886 / pr-6949 / pr-6959 —— fix(spec,cli,runtime,service-datasource)!: one driver vocabulary — os start and os migrate stop disagreeing (#6345) #6910 不在其中;
5. 手工 enable_pr_auto_merge 后才重新入队。

也就是说它带着全绿的 CI 在队列外躺了约 20 分钟,期间没有任何 webhook 通知。这是「沉默即歧义」的典型:auto-merge 掉了不会通知,而「没有入队通知」与「还在跑 CI」在外部看起来完全一样。

修正后的口径(建议并入 ②):

merge queue 失败弹出本身不关 auto-merge;但弹出后若有新推送,auto-merge 会掉。⇒ 每次 dev 为队列失败推修复之后,必须回读队列成员资格(git ls-remote --heads origin 'refs/heads/gh-readonly-queue/*',不吃 REST),CI 已绿而不在队列 ⇒ 手工重新 arm。⛔ 不要依赖「它会自己回去」。

⚠️ 与 ⑩ 合看:⑩ 已记「翻 ready 会清掉 auto-merge 与队列成员资格」。本条是同一现象的第二个触发器 —— 真正的规律是「任何使 head 变化或 draft 状态变化的事件都可能清掉 arm」,而不只是翻 draft 这一种。下次刷新正文时建议把 ② 与 ⑩ 合并成这一句。

同批另记一条,来自队列管家 round 71 的审计记录:#6910 这一次弹出连带弹掉了四个不相干的 PR(#6932、#6935、#6918、#6820,同批次、byte-identical 签名),它们在 #6910 离队后于 06:03–06:05Z 各自恢复并合入。⇒ 教训 ⑨(强断言 ≠ 稳断言)的成本面应补上一句:本车道今晚两次给全仓上税 —— #6855 的 flaky 弹掉两个,#6910 的真回归弹掉四个。

---

Generated by Claude Code