The build of this program fails even if the instructions in the README are followed. This is probably because the source code uses argument-less declarations for functions with arguments.
In addition to the use of error(), the subject of a pending pull request, the source code also declares many functions without arguments, but defines them later to have arguments. Examples are void (*Mf_program)() = NULLFUNC;, static long to32bit(), etc. These declarations abound and it is too tedious to correct all of them. Is there a build option to allow the compiler to accept these declarations?
The build of this program fails even if the instructions in the README are followed. This is probably because the source code uses argument-less declarations for functions with arguments.
In addition to the use of
error(), the subject of a pending pull request, the source code also declares many functions without arguments, but defines them later to have arguments. Examples arevoid (*Mf_program)() = NULLFUNC;,static long to32bit(), etc. These declarations abound and it is too tedious to correct all of them. Is there a build option to allow the compiler to accept these declarations?